MachineMachine /stream - tagged with dawkins http://machinemachine.net/stream/feed en-us http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Sweetcron therourke@gmail.com No secularism please, we're British http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/no-secularism-please-were-british-6917549.html/no-secularism-please-were-british-home-news-uk-the-independent No secularism please, we're British http://t.co/M2A2PHQt ]]> Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:20:20 -0700 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/no-secularism-please-were-british-6917549.html/no-secularism-please-were-british-home-news-uk-the-independent The case for reconciling the scientific with the divine -- and against the anti-religion of Richard Dawkins http://life.salon.com/2011/10/02/how_science_and_faith_coexist/singleton/?mobile.html As a both a scientist and a humanist myself, I have struggled to understand different claims to knowledge, and I have eventually come to a formulation of the kind of religious belief that would, in my view, be compatible with science. The first step in this journey is to state what I will call the Central Doctrine of science: All properties and events in the physical universe are governed by laws, and those laws are true at every time and place in the universe. Although scientists do not talk explicitly about this doctrine, and my doctoral thesis advisor never mentioned… ]]> Sat, 08 Oct 2011 10:01:04 -0700 http://life.salon.com/2011/10/02/how_science_and_faith_coexist/singleton/?mobile.html The New Atheism http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/aug/26/james-wood-the-new-atheism?CMP=twt_fd Trapped in the childhood literalism of my background, I had not entertained the possibility of Christian belief separated from the great lure and threat of heaven and hell.

The New Atheism is locked into a similar kind of literalism. It parasitically lives off its enemy. Just as evangelical Christianity is characterised by scriptural literalism and an uncomplicated belief in a "personal God", so the New Atheism often seems engaged only in doing battle with scriptural literalism; but the only way to combat such literalism is with rival literalism. The God of the New Atheism and the God… ]]>
Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:21:05 -0700 http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/aug/26/james-wood-the-new-atheism?CMP=twt_fd
The New Athe­ists' Nar­row Worldview http://chronicle.com/article/The-New-Athe-ists-Nar-row/126027/ With tongues in cheeks, Rich­ard Daw­kins, Chris­to­pher Hitch­ens, Sam Har­ris, and Dan­iel Dennett are embracing their reputation as the "Four Horsemen." Lampoon­ing the anx­i­eties of evan­geli­cals, these best-sell­ing athe­ists are em­brac­ing their "dan­gerous" sta­tus and dar­ing be­liev­ers to match their for­mi­da­ble philo­soph­i­cal acu­men.

Ac­cord­ing to these sol­diers of rea­son, the time for re­li­gion is over. It clings like a bad gene rep­li­cat­ing in the pop­u­la­tion, but its use­ful­ness is played out. Sam Har­ris's most re­cent book, The Moral Land­scape (Free Press, 2010), is the lat­est in the continuing bat­tle. As an ag­nos­tic, I find much of the… ]]>
Mon, 24 Jan 2011 03:58:29 -0700 http://chronicle.com/article/The-New-Athe-ists-Nar-row/126027/
Hate E-mails with Richard Dawkins http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZuowNcuGsc&feature=youtube_gdata ]]> Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:05:49 -0700 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZuowNcuGsc&feature=youtube_gdata Titans of science: David Attenborough meets Richard Dawkins http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2010/sep/11/science-david-attenborough-richard-dawkins We paired up Britain's most celebrated scientists to chat about the big issues: the unity of life, ethics, energy, Handel – and the joy of riding a snowmobile Sir David Attenborough, 84, is a naturalist and broadcaster. He studied geology and zoology at Cambridge before joining the BBC in 1952 and presenting landmark series including Life On Earth (1979), The Living Planet (1984) and, recently, Life. Richard Dawkins, 69, was educated at Oxford, later lectured there and became its first professor of the public understanding of science. An evolutionary biologist, he is the author of 10 books, including The Selfish… ]]> Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:00:00 -0700 http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2010/sep/11/science-david-attenborough-richard-dawkins Believe it or Not http://www.firstthings.com/article/2010/04/believe-it-or-not I think I am very close to concluding that this whole “New Atheism” movement is only a passing fad—not the cultural watershed its purveyors imagine it to be, but simply one of those occasional and inexplicable marketing vogues that inevitably go the way of pet rocks, disco, prime-time soaps, and The Bridges of Madison County. This is not because I necessarily think the current “marketplace of ideas” particularly good at sorting out wise arguments from foolish. But the latest trend in à la mode godlessness, it seems to me, has by now proved itself to be so intellectually and morally… ]]> Sun, 16 May 2010 16:19:00 -0700 http://www.firstthings.com/article/2010/04/believe-it-or-not Conceiving God: the Cognitive Origin and Evolution of Religion http://www.newstatesman.com/books/2010/04/religion-religious-lewis Atheists like Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens confront the faithful head-on, but there may be another way to dispel religious beliefs.

I am not so sure about this. In my experience, waverers and Sunday-only observers can find forthright challenges to religious pretensions
a relief and a liberation. They give them the reason, sometimes the courage, to abandon those shreds of early-acquired religious habit that cling around their ankles and trip them up.

Still, Darwin and David Lewis-Williams have a point in thinking, as the former put it, that "direct arguments against [religion] produce… ]]>
Sun, 04 Apr 2010 06:56:00 -0700 http://www.newstatesman.com/books/2010/04/religion-religious-lewis
Theology for atheists http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2010/jan/04/religion-atheism Theology lets us talk about deep and irrational urges. This is seen by some atheists as weakness. But maybe it's a strength as well James Wood, a writer who himself has lived between the tugs of belief and unbelief, made an eloquent call in the New Yorker last August for "a theologically engaged atheism". Concluding a review of Terry Eagleton's recent attack on Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens, he imagines something "only a semitone from faith [which] could give a brother's account of belief, rather than treat it as some unwanted impoverished relative." At the American Academy of Religion meeting… ]]> Fri, 08 Jan 2010 03:29:00 -0700 http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2010/jan/04/religion-atheism Science Is Interesting http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quSRLETlKDg&feature=youtube_gdata ]]> Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:46:00 -0700 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quSRLETlKDg&feature=youtube_gdata Atheism: class is a distraction http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2009/oct/08/atheism-religion-class-science For some reasons it seems to be anathema to say that there might be an intrinsic reason for the correlation between educational level and the rejection of religion: atheism takes training, and is more difficult. We accept that in medicine, physics and mathematics, but, for reasons of political correctness, it is very much considered a faux pas to say the old 19th-century thing: it takes education to develop a worldview based on science. It would be even more outrageous to say that the reasons for choosing atheism over religion might actually be valid, as the so-called new atheists have dared… ]]> Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:14:00 -0700 http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2009/oct/08/atheism-religion-class-science The Chin Review http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rJ206ApObI&feature=youtube_gdata ]]> Fri, 02 Oct 2009 07:27:00 -0700 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rJ206ApObI&feature=youtube_gdata Must science declare a holy war on religion? http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-mooney11-2009aug11,0,6581208.story This fall, evolutionary biologist and bestselling author Richard Dawkins -- most recently famous for his public exhortation to atheism, "The God Delusion" -- returns to writing about science. Dawkins' new book, "The Greatest Show on Earth," will inform and regale us with the stunning "evidence for evolution," as the subtitle says. It will surely be an impressive display, as Dawkins excels at making the case for evolution. But it's also fair to ask: Who in the United States will read Dawkins' new book (or ones like it) and have any sort of epiphany, or change his or her mind? Surely… ]]> Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:32:00 -0700 http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-mooney11-2009aug11,0,6581208.story